It’s an ‘Ag Gag’: Farmers in Canada shift away from transparency, silence whistleblowers, and increase the vulnerability of farm animals

This fall, Alberta and Ontario introduced American style “ag gag” legislation that targets people who would report poor farmed animal conditions, abuse and cruelty. Typically, this type of legislation contains provisions that prohibit people from deceiving their employers and taking or possessing photographs, video or audio recordings without the farm owner’s consent, and levies significant fines to deter this kind of action.

There are multiple concerns about an industry retreat from transparency and accountability, but at the heart of it, ag gag laws such as these silence whistleblowers – by definition – people who expose information or activities that are illegal or unethical.

Why should we be concerned?

Because the animal protection system in Canada is complaint-based. In other words, an investigation into allegations of animal abuse can’t begin until someone files a complaint. It is well established that people who would report wrongdoing – especially employees – won’t in a climate of fear and reprisals.

Designed to Chill

Alberta’s Bill 27, passed in just 10 days, amends laws that pertain to animals on the farm. Bill 156 in Ontario, currently before the legislature, also moves to limit people who interact with or approach animals, or document animal conditions on transport trucks and going into slaughter plants. Both bills contain clauses regarding actions taken under “false pretenses” and levy significant fines. The bills do not define false pretenses; they leave it to farmers’ discretion. In Ontario, farmers can detain, use force and arrest people they suspect of such interaction. Such broad offences and powers with such high fines are designed to chill anyone from coming forward for fear they will be in trouble.

Animals on Canadian farms already lack external oversight. In fact, there are no regulations pertaining to on-farm animal welfare. All codes of practice are industry-driven and voluntary in many provinces including Ontario. With such little oversight or enforcement, sadly, undercover footage is required to better protect farmed animals. This is demonstrated by recent prominent cases in Canada:

  • Undercover footage from a dairy farm in Chilliwack, BC, revealed workers viciously kicking, punching and beating animals with chains, metal pipes, canes and rakes. This resulted in seven employees charged with 20 counts of animal cruelty.
  • Undercover footage that brought to light animal cruelty at the Hybrid Turkey Farm in Ontario resulted in 11 charges.

Now, instead of increasing transparency and oversight in response to such horrific examples of cruelty happening on farms, producers are choosing to shut all the doors, withdraw into secrecy and leave animals unprotected.

Together we can make a difference

In a time when the public is calling for greater protection and accountability, farmed animals are made even more vulnerable in a system with little to no oversight coupled with a complaints-based enforcement regime by significant efforts to silence any reporting.

Take a moment to send your M.P.P. your concerns! 

You can help

Humane Canada campaigns for improvements to a broad range of policies and regulations to improve the treatment of farm animals at the provincial and federal level.

Your support means we can continue this crucial work in farm animal protection, please consider supporting this national perspective and the work we do to build a humane Canada for everyone.